Journal - Topic
LLM benchmark
Entries on LLM benchmark
· 4 min read
BenchLeader now lists the Startrise Frontend benchmark: 29 model configurations, Claude Opus 5 leading at 82.3, and every score matching our published board.
llm benchmarkai codingbenchleader
· 11 min read
LLM coding benchmarks that still count in October 2026: SWE-bench Pro, Terminal-Bench 4.0, FrontierCode and CursorBench. SWE-bench Verified is saturated.
llm benchmarkai codingcoding benchmarks
· 31 min read
GPT-6 Astra vs Claude Opus 5.5 on our 12-brief frontend benchmark: Opus 5.5 (high) 80.2, Astra 79.9, GPT-6.1 Sol 78.6 for $1.66. 13 new models, blind-judged.
gpt-6 astraclaude opus 5.5gpt-6.1 solclaude fable 5.1
· 19 min read
Grok 4.6 vs Qwen3.8-Max on our 12-brief frontend benchmark, blind-reviewed: 72.1 vs 71.3, inside noise. Six briefs each, all 24 builds linked live.
grok 4.6qwen3.8-maxllm benchmarkai coding
· 16 min read
Muse Spark 1.2 benchmark: 70.3 blended, 7th of 15 on our 12-brief frontend test, vs GLM 5.2 (72.1), Claude Opus 5 and GPT-5.6 Luna. Full suite cost: $0.62.
muse spark 1.2llm benchmarkmeta aiai coding
· 11 min read
Best LLM for frontend development, web and UI design, from 353 blind-judged builds: Claude Opus 5 for specs, Fable 5 for open-ended design, GPT-6.1 Sol for value.
llm benchmarkclaude opus 5kimi k3frontend development
· 16 min read
LLM frontend benchmark by Startrise: 12 models built the same 12 UIs, browser-gated, judged blind. Claude Opus 5 and Kimi K3 tied on top; full leaderboard.
llm benchmarkai codingclaude opus 5kimi k3
· 11 min read
Self-preference bias in LLM judges, measured: we made 10 frontier models grade each other's work across 839 blind calls, including our own benchmark winner.
llm as a judgellm benchmarkai evaluationclaude opus 5